Southern white rhinoceros Archives - Rhino Review

Las Vegas lawyer to pay $25,000 fine for selling taxidermy rhino mount (Nevada, US)

By Illegal trade No Comments
Cody Miller, News 3 LV | January 18, 2020

Read the original story here

LAS VEGAS: Jack Ely Buchanan, the 37-year-old defense attorney behind the Las Vegas firm Buchanan Defense Law, was ordered in federal court on Jan. 10 to pay a $25,000 fine for violating the Endangered Species Act.

Buchanan, who was also sentenced to two years of probation and 40 hours of community service, was found guilty of illegally selling a taxidermy mount of a rhinoceros.

The incident occurred in June of 2014 when, according to court documents, a prospective Minnesota buyer emailed Buchanan about purchasing the southern white rhinoceros half-mount.

Original photo as published by News 3 LV: In this undated photo provided by Safari Park Dvur Kralove, Black Rhino Manny is photographed at Safari Park Dvur Kralov, in Dvur Kralove nad Labem, Czech Republic. (Oliver Le Que/Safari Park Dvur Kralove via AP)

Buchanan and the buyer negotiated and planned the sale of the mount for $6,500. At the same time, Buchanan inquired about the legality of the sale to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serve Division of Management Authority, which replied that the sale was prohibited since the mount “may be, including a transfer, donation, or exchange, only for noncommercial purposes.”

However, a week after Buchanan’s inquiry, the buyer arrived in Las Vegas, rented a moving truck and, with Buchanan, went to the lawyer’s residence and loaded the mount into the truck.

The rhino mount, made with real horns and hide, was then taken back to the buyer’s home in Minnesota.

Afterward, Buchanan sent a fraudulent Transfer of Ownership Note to the buyer, falsely characterizing the transaction as “not for purposes of sale, but an in-kind donation of property.”

Rhino horns mistakenly believed to hold medicinal value and also seen as a symbol of status and wealth, are in exceedingly high demand in southeast Asia, selling for as much as $25,000 per pound.

The horns form Buchanan’s mount could have sold for more than $435,000.

Illegal sales of rhino parts, like the one Buchanan engaged in, support the black market and can contribute to the illegal hunting of rhinos in the wild.


Two white rhinos killed in Kenya, horns stolen

By Illegal trade, News No Comments
The East African | December 9, 2019

Read the original story here

Two southern white rhinos have been shot and killed in central Kenya, and their horns stolen.

The raiders gained access to the highly secured electric-fenced Lewa Wildlife Conservancy in Meru County around 11pm Friday night, Chief Operations Officer Dr Tuqa Jirmo confirmed.

In a statement to media, he said; “This incident serves as a reminder that the threat from poaching is ever present, and all sanctuaries holding rhinos cannot afford to be complacent. The poaching scourge and illegal rhino horn trade continue to put the survival of rhinos at risk across the continent.”

He added that the conservancy is working with the police and Kenya Wildlife Service over the incident.

Proposal to open up rhino horn trade rejected

By Law & legislation No Comments
Rachel Fobar, National Geographic | August 25, 2019

Read the original story

GENEVA: Countries have voted against decreasing protections for southern white rhinos at the 18th Conference of the Parties for CITES, the wildlife trade treaty, underway in Geneva, Switzerland. International trade in rhino parts has been banned since 1977, but at this year’s conference, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) and Namibia proposed loosening restrictions for their respective countries. The vote still needs to be finalized at the plenary session at the end, when all appendix change proposals passed in committee are officially adopted.

“I was encouraged and relieved to see parties resoundingly reject the proposal calling for legal international trade in rhino horn,” says Taylor Tench, a wildlife policy analyst for the Environmental Investigation Agency. “Rhino populations remain under immense pressure from poaching and illegal trade, and legalizing trade in rhino horn would have been disastrous for the world’s remaining rhino populations. . . . Now is simply not the time to weaken protections for rhinos.”

Other countries, including Kenya and Nigeria, worry that legalizing the trade would undermine the survival Africa’s wild rhinos.

“Humankind can do without rhino horn,” said a representative from Kenya during the debate. “It is not medicine.”

Southern white rhinos like these are less rare than black rhinos, making them easier targets for poachers. (Photo by Gerry van der Walt, Shannon Elizabeth Foundation archive.)

Thought to be extinct in the late 1800s, the southern white rhino is classified today as near threatened by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which determines the conservation status of species. There are about 18,000 in protected areas and private game reserves today, almost all in South Africa, according to the IUCN. Black rhinos, which are smaller and have a hooked rather than square lip, are classified as critically endangered, with only about 5,000 remaining. They’re found mostly in Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, and Kenya.

In 2005, Eswatini allowed the noncommercial trade in live rhinos and hunting trophies but not rhino horn. The country put forward a failed proposal to open the commercial rhino horn trade at the last CITES Conference of the Parties, in 2016. Eswatini’s white rhino population reached 90 in 2015, but following one of the country’s worst droughts in recent history, it had fallen to just 66 by December 2017. This year, the country re-upped a proposal to allow for commercial trade in their rhinos, including horn and parts. In a 25-102 vote by secret ballot, this measure was defeated.

Meanwhile, Namibia proposed that CITES downlist its southern white rhinos from Appendix I to Appendix II, with an annotation allowing for trade in live rhinos and export of hunting trophies. Though this move would technically weaken protections, conservationists said it wouldn’t have any significant implications in practice, since Namibia is already allowed noncommercial trade in live rhinos and hunting trophies under the Appendix I listing.

In the proposal, Namibia argued that its population no longer warrants the highest protection under CITES and that the restriction preventing export for “primarily commercial purposes” has held the country back from generating revenue for conservation. From 2008 to 2018, Namibia exported 27 white rhinos to Angola, Cuba, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Africa. Namibia’s proposal anticipates creating “access to a far larger market for white rhinos,” especially with its primary trading partner South Africa. The country has nearly a thousand rhinos, and according to the CITES secretariat, the population is “increasing.”

“We are deeply concerned that unjustified trade restriction on the Namibian white rhino population, if not removed, will only deprive Namibia of their required resources to manage its populations effectively,” said a representative from Namibia during the debate.

Nonetheless, says Tench of the EIA, Namibia’s rhinos are at risk from poaching, which has intensified since 2014. The proposal was narrowly rejected in a 39-82 vote.

Hundreds of rhinos are poached every year—an average of about three a day, according to Tench—mostly for their horns. Made of keratin (the same protein that makes up our hair and fingernails), rhino horn is often used as a cure-all in traditional medicine in China, Vietnam, and elsewhere in Asia. Because southern white rhinos are more abundant and live in more open habitat, they’ve borne the brunt of the poaching, Tench says. (Go inside the deadly rhino horn trade.)

Eswatini says it has nearly 730 pounds of stockpiled rhino horn, with a commercial value of $9.9 million. Funds from sales of that rhino horn, it contends in its proposal, would have helped conservation efforts.

“Money is at the very core of the matter,” said a representative from Eswatini during the debate. “If the finance is not available to protect them, rhinos will continue to die.”

Opening the commercial rhino horn trade could have had disastrous implications, Tench says. It could have spawned a parallel illegal market, stimulated new demand for rhino horn, increased poaching, and created an enforcement burden for officials, who would have been tasked with the impossible responsibility of distinguishing legal from illegal rhino horn. “It ultimately could just kick off a new wave of demand that would be met by increased poaching. And Eswatini—it’s not the country that even could hope to supply rhino horn internationally. They have 66 rhinos.”

What’s more, the trade in rhino horn is illegal in China and Vietnam, where demand for rhino horn exists, leading conservationists to ask: Who would have engaged Eswatini in the rhino horn trade?

Neither China nor Vietnam has declared any intention to legalize the trade, although China flirted with the idea last October, when the government announced that tiger bone and rhino horn could be used legally in medical research or for traditional medicine. Soon after, a senior official announced that China was postponing lifting the ban on rhino and tiger parts, pending further study.

“The suggestion that there’s value in the rhino horn that Eswatini has is kind of false anyway, because they’re projecting that based on a black-market value and an assumption that those legal markets would open up again,” says Matt Collis, director of international policy at the International Fund for Animal Welfare, an animal welfare and conservation nonprofit that does works to prevent rhino poaching.

Collis says it’s unclear what Namibia hoped to achieve with its proposal—since under current regulations, noncommercial trade in live rhinos and trophies is already allowed in the country.

So, he says, this could have been a first step toward liberalizing trade in the future, because the proposal would have moved Namibia’s rhinos to Appendix II.

“It’s not necessarily clear what the motivation is, unless it’s for something for the longer term,” Collis says.

Going forward, Collis says conservationists need to help countries who bear the burden of protecting these species find another way to fund their efforts. “It does need a concerted effort from the international community to offer alternative ways of financing,” he says.

Southern white rhinoceros pair arrives at Mysuru Zoo from Singapore

By Relocation No Comments

The Star of Mysore | August 19, 2019

Read the original story here

Under animal exchange programme between Mysuru Zoo and Singapore Zoo, a pair of Southern White Rhinoceros from Singapore Zoo reached Bengaluru Airport by air and then to Mysuru Zoo on Aug. 12.

Two-year-old Oban and 3.9- year-old Vita Rhinos have been kept in Quarantine enclosure under observation. To guide us in introducing Rhinos to our facility, Head Keeper with more than 35 years experience Chidambaram from Singapore Zoo has accompanied Rhinos to Mysuru Zoo.

Original photo from: Star of Mysore

After a gap of three years, Mysuru Zoo again gets an opportunity to house and display Southern White Rhinos. In captivity, they can live up to 40 years. Both male and female will mature early and start reproducing at the age of 6-8 years in captive conditions.

Dr. K.R. Ramesh, Assistant Director & Head of the Veterinary Section and A.V. Sathish, Range Forest Officer and Head of the Animal Section, planned and arranged required logistics, according to a press release from the Zoo Executive Director Ajit Kulkarni.